India’s textile sector continues to be a critical contributor to manufacturing output, employment, and exports. Yet, from a financial standpoint, the margin conversation within textiles is increasingly segmented. Traditional apparel and conventional textiles remain volume-driven and labour-intensive, while technical textiles are emerging as a value-led, capital- and knowledge-intensive segment. What stands out is not just the difference in end markets, but the fundamentally different margin architecture across these segments.
Policy focus under the Ministry of Textiles has, over recent years, explicitly recognised this divergence, particularly through targeted schemes for man-made fibres and technical textiles, reflecting a shift from scale-led growth to margin and value sustainability.
Traditional apparel and conventional textiles: margin realities
From an industry risk point of view, traditional apparel and home textiles operate in a highly competitive environment, characterised by:
• Thin operating margins driven by intense price competition
• High labour cost sensitivity, especially post labour code rationalisation
• Working capital pressure due to long receivable cycles in export markets
• Volatility in cotton and yarn prices is impacting gross margins
According to the Ministry of Textiles and IBEF assessments through FY25, conventional textile and apparel segments typically operate in low-to-mid single-digit operating margins, with limited pricing power. Export-oriented units face additional forex-linked volatility, while domestic-focused players absorb frequent cost shocks without commensurate price pass-through.
From a compliance perspective, these segments also face rising statutory costs—ESI, PF, safety norms and ESG-linked disclosures—which compress margins further. Financially, this translates into tighter cost controls, aggressive inventory management, and heightened sensitivity in margin forecasts and impairment assessments.
Technical textiles: a structurally different margin profile
Technical textiles, by contrast, operate on a different economic plane. Covering segments such as medical textiles, geotextiles, agro-textiles and industrial textiles, this category benefits from:
• Application-driven demand rather than fashion cycles
• Higher entry barriers due to certification, testing and IP requirements
• Lower labour intensity and higher automation
• Greater scope for cost-plus or contract-based pricing
From a financial viewpoint, technical textile manufacturers typically report operating margins that are structurally superior to conventional textiles, often in the low-to-mid teens, as highlighted in Ministry of Textiles and PIB releases during FY25. The PLI framework for technical textiles has further improved asset utilisation and margin visibility by incentivising scale with value addition.
What is notable is that margin stability here is less exposed to cotton price cycles and seasonal demand, making earnings quality more predictable—a critical consideration for long-term capital allocation.
Financial, accounting and compliance implications of the margin gap
The margin differential between these segments has meaningful implications for financial reporting and controls:
• Capex and depreciation planning: Technical textiles require higher upfront capital but offer longer asset lives and steadier returns.
• Inventory valuation: Conventional textiles face higher NRV risks due to fashion obsolescence, unlike application-based technical products.
• Revenue recognition: Technical textiles often involve milestone-based or long-term supply contracts, requiring tighter revenue recognition discipline.
• Credit risk management: Lower customer concentration and institutional buyers in technical textiles reduce receivable risk.
From a regulatory standpoint, certification costs, product approvals and quality audits are higher in technical textiles, but these also serve as protective moats, supporting margin sustainability over time.
Medium-term outlook: where margin sustainability appears stronger
From a policy lens, India’s push to increase the share of technical textiles to around 15% of total textile output over the medium term signals where margin expansion opportunities are likely to concentrate. While conventional apparel will remain critical for employment and export volumes, margin-led growth appears structurally constrained.
In my view, the strategic shift underway is less about replacing traditional textiles and more about balancing portfolio economics. For industry stakeholders, the key implication is clear: future profitability will increasingly depend on product mix, capital discipline, and the ability to move up the value chain rather than scale alone.
As India aligns its textile ambitions with global demand for performance-driven materials, the margin math decisively favours segments where technology, compliance and financial resilience intersect.
Uploaded On: 
Author: 
